Marat Safin vs Jim Courier Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W W L W L
Form
L L W W W L L L L WHead-2-Head: Safin 1 - 1 Courier
They have played 7 sets in total, with Safin winning 4 and Courier winning 3. The last match between Safin and Courier was at the 14th Paris Open - Paris, 01-11-1999, Quarterfinals, Carpet with Marat Safin getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Marat Safin | 1 |
| Jim Courier | 1 |
14th Paris Open - Paris(01-11-1999)
6
2
6
4
| Safin | Stats | Courier |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 3 | Highest Rank | 23 |
| 45 | Age | 54 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 15 | Titles | 24 |
| 61% (433-274) | Career Total W/L | 69% (507-231) |
| $2,658,705 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Zandschulp VS Struff PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Noskova VS Carle PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 | |||||
| 0-6 6-4 4-6 6-1 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 33 | Games Won | 28 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Marat Safin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Juan Martin Del Potro
Player
Marat Safin
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
102)
11
Aces
15
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
19 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
102)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marat Safin
Player
Thierry Ascione
63%
(
65 of
104)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
24
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
32%
(
33 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
25 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Player
Marat Safin
69%
(
68 of
98)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
7
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
35 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marat Safin
Player
Denis Istomin
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
55 of
76)
12
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marat Safin
Player
Igor Andreev
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve %
78%
(
29 of
37)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
10 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
36
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marat Safin
Player
Richard Gasquet
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
70)
14
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evgeny Korolev
Player
Marat Safin
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marat Safin
Player
Nikolay Davydenko
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
10
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
71%
(
25 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
22 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Berdych
Player
Marat Safin
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
2
Aces
18
4
Double Faults
1
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marat Safin
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
12
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jim Courier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | |||
| SF | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-5 6-7(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-7(4) 6-3 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (433/274) | Win/Loss | 69% (507/231) |
| 58% (1117/821) | Sets Win/Loss | 65% (1277/676) |
| 52% (10136/9277) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (10450/8492) |
| 63% (164/96) | Hard Win/Loss | 70% (241/102) |
| 60% (124/81) | Clay Win/Loss | 72% (119/46) |
| 60% (119/78) | Indoor Hard W/L | 65% (121/66) |
| 58% (26/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 60% (26/17) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 1975 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.06 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 551 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 464.15 | Average Opponent Rank | 251.81 |
| 57% (10801/18834) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 74% (7992/10801) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (4167/8045) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 39% (625/1604) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 37% (6991/19037) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 71% (95/38) | Slam W/L | 76% (118/38) |
| 59% (116/82) | Masters W/L | 66% (137/72) |
| 54% (25/21) | Cups W/L | 70% (7/3) |
| 60% (180/118) | Main Tour W/L | 69% (223/101) |
| 36% (4/7) | Tour Finals W/L | 44% (7/9) |
| 67% (12/6) | Challenger W/L | 71% (12/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (308/526) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (367/548) |
| 69% (120/174) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 74% (138/187) |
| 54% (213/395) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (153/260) |
| 57% (146/256) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (110/203) |
| 84% (412/346) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (514/444) |
| 16% (412/65) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (514/69) |
| 28% (295/83) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (223/62) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
